<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Linux Ls Command To Show File Timestamp In Detail Of Seconds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walkernews.net/2009/03/11/get-linux-ls-command-to-show-file-timestamp-in-detail-of-seconds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walkernews.net/2009/03/11/get-linux-ls-command-to-show-file-timestamp-in-detail-of-seconds/</link>
	<description>A capsule of walker's experience in life...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:09:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.walkernews.net/2009/03/11/get-linux-ls-command-to-show-file-timestamp-in-detail-of-seconds/#comment-13051</link>
		<dc:creator>Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkernews.net/?p=2119#comment-13051</guid>
		<description>Maybe the timestamp is exactly at 0 nano-second.

Please run either one of these commands to see if your system actually record timestamp in detail:
&lt;pre&gt;
ls -l --full-time /proc/net/
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;
find / -exec ls -l --time-style=&#039;+%N&#039; {} \; &#124; awk &#039;{if ($6 != &#039;000000000&#039;){print $0}}&#039;
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the timestamp is exactly at 0 nano-second.</p>
<p>Please run either one of these commands to see if your system actually record timestamp in detail:</p>
<pre>
ls -l --full-time /proc/net/
</pre>
<pre>
find / -exec ls -l --time-style='+%N' {} \; | awk '{if ($6 != '000000000'){print $0}}'
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.walkernews.net/2009/03/11/get-linux-ls-command-to-show-file-timestamp-in-detail-of-seconds/#comment-13049</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkernews.net/?p=2119#comment-13049</guid>
		<description>Thank  you for this guide. I&#039;m having a problem with the full-time on one of my systems, for some reason it seems that system is not recording time stamps out the the ms rage (see example below) does anyone have any ideas how to resolve this?

Behaving as expected:
&lt;pre&gt;
-bash-3.00$ ls -1t --full-time
-rw-r--r--  1 user group  226233 2010-12-21 23:15:36.000149000 +0000 filename1
-rw-r--r--  1 user group  226800 2010-12-21 23:15:36.000119000 +0000 filename2
&lt;/pre&gt;
Not behaving as expected:
&lt;pre&gt;
-bash-3.00$  ls -1t --full-time
-rw-r--r--  1 user group  226800 2010-12-21 18:36:56.000000000 +0000 filename1
-rw-r--r--  1 user group  226800 2010-12-21 18:36:56.000000000 +0000 filename2
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank  you for this guide. I&#8217;m having a problem with the full-time on one of my systems, for some reason it seems that system is not recording time stamps out the the ms rage (see example below) does anyone have any ideas how to resolve this?</p>
<p>Behaving as expected:</p>
<pre>
-bash-3.00$ ls -1t --full-time
-rw-r--r--  1 user group  226233 2010-12-21 23:15:36.000149000 +0000 filename1
-rw-r--r--  1 user group  226800 2010-12-21 23:15:36.000119000 +0000 filename2
</pre>
<p>Not behaving as expected:</p>
<pre>
-bash-3.00$  ls -1t --full-time
-rw-r--r--  1 user group  226800 2010-12-21 18:36:56.000000000 +0000 filename1
-rw-r--r--  1 user group  226800 2010-12-21 18:36:56.000000000 +0000 filename2
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

