<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista Activation Cracks Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walkernews.net/2007/05/11/windows-vista-activation-cracks-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walkernews.net/2007/05/11/windows-vista-activation-cracks-comparison/</link>
	<description>A capsule of walker's experience in life...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:09:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweak Windows Vista Bubbles Screen Saver - Walker News</title>
		<link>http://www.walkernews.net/2007/05/11/windows-vista-activation-cracks-comparison/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweak Windows Vista Bubbles Screen Saver - Walker News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkernews.net/2007/05/11/windows-vista-activation-cracks-comparison/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>[...] with each versions of Windows OS, all Windows Vista editions bundled with some official screen savers. However, not all of these Vista screen savers allow users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with each versions of Windows OS, all Windows Vista editions bundled with some official screen savers. However, not all of these Vista screen savers allow users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Setup TinyDNS Server In 3 Minutes - Walker News</title>
		<link>http://www.walkernews.net/2007/05/11/windows-vista-activation-cracks-comparison/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Setup TinyDNS Server In 3 Minutes - Walker News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkernews.net/2007/05/11/windows-vista-activation-cracks-comparison/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>[...] 2000, Windows XP, Windows 2003, Windows Vista [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2000, Windows XP, Windows 2003, Windows Vista [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genenio</title>
		<link>http://www.walkernews.net/2007/05/11/windows-vista-activation-cracks-comparison/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>genenio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 01:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkernews.net/2007/05/11/windows-vista-activation-cracks-comparison/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Timerstop causes no problems with Vista&#039;s operation, as you have implied.  The system is recognized as legit thus far so there is no problem with updates or other downloads.  You also don&#039;t have to enter a key, which can be blacklisted later on.  Finally, for the life of me, I don&#039;t see why people want an activated system.  In an unactivated state you can do whatever you want and move the OS between drives, etc., without being bothered with--you said it--REACTIVATION!

That&#039;s why timerstop is the best (and mind you, simplest) crack IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timerstop causes no problems with Vista&#8217;s operation, as you have implied.  The system is recognized as legit thus far so there is no problem with updates or other downloads.  You also don&#8217;t have to enter a key, which can be blacklisted later on.  Finally, for the life of me, I don&#8217;t see why people want an activated system.  In an unactivated state you can do whatever you want and move the OS between drives, etc., without being bothered with&#8211;you said it&#8211;REACTIVATION!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why timerstop is the best (and mind you, simplest) crack IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

